10 Best Dedicated Crypto Node Providers in 2026

In this article, I will talk about the Best Dedicated Crypto Node Providers for developers, enterprises, dApps, DeFi platforms, and Web3 projects. I’ll compare their blockchain coverage, node types, WebSocket support, deployment options, pricing models, scalability, reliability, security, and enterprise support to help you find the right dedicated infrastructure provider for your specific blockchain workload and requirements.

What is a dedicated crypto node?

A dedicated crypto node is a blockchain node that is set aside for a specific customer, application or organization, instead of sharing infrastructure with lots of users. It offers direct access to blockchain networks to read on-chain data, submit transactions, run applications, and support APIs or RPC endpoints.

Dedicated nodes provide more consistent performance, more capacity to handle requests, better isolation, configurability, and greater reliability. They are widely adopted by exchanges, wallets, DeFi protocols, Web3 applications, analytics platforms and enterprises that require consistent blockchain connectivity and more control over their infrastructure.

How to Choose a Dedicated Crypto Node Provider

Blockchain Support – Pick a provider that can support the exact networks your app needs, especially if you plan to run on multiple ecosystems or add more chains later.

Node types – See if the provider offers full, archive, validator, RPC, or dedicated nodes. Choose the node type that matches the data and infrastructure needs of your application.

Performance & Reliability – infrastructure capacity, uptime guaranties, request handling, synchronization, redundancy, and overall reliability to ensure consistent blockchain access during peak load periods.

WebSocket & API Support – If your application needs real-time blockchain events, transaction tracking, or constant access to on-chain data, then opt for one that offers HTTP, WebSocket, JSON-RPC, and developer APIs.

Pricing Compare subscription, usage based and custom enterprise pricing. Don’t just look at the advertized starting price. Look at the requests, bandwidth, storage, archive access, dedicated resources, and other infrastructure costs.

Scalability – Choose a provider that can scale node resources, add more nodes, support multiple regions, or provide load balancing as your application’s blockchain traffic increases.

Security & Access Control – Before deploying sensitive production workloads, review authentication, private endpoints, IP allowlisting, encryption, infrastructure isolation, monitoring, and other security controls.

Deployment Options – Determine if you require managed cloud infrastructure, dedicated servers, private environments, or decentralized infrastructure. The right deployment model is a matter of how much operational control you want to have.

Enterprise Support & SLA – Mission-critical application companies should opt for providers having defined SLAs, technical support, monitoring, incident response, and dedicated assistance.

Developer Experience – Good documentation, simple APIs, dashboards, monitoring tools, SDKs and clear configuration options can help reduce the time to deploy and maintain blockchain infrastructure.

Are Dedicated Crypto Nodes Worth the Cost?

For businesses and applications that need uninterrupted blockchain performance, more ability to service requests, reliable RPC access, and more control over their infrastructure, dedicated crypto nodes can be worth the cost.

Shared endpoints are less resource contention and more predictable experience for high-traffic dApps, exchanges, wallets, DeFi protocols, gaming platforms and analytics systems than dedicated nodes.

They also enable support for custom configurations, data archiving, WebSocket access, monitoring and scaling and enterprise support. Shared RPC plans however might be more cost effective for smaller projects with limited traffic.

Ultimately the right choice is determined by workload, supported chains, performance requirements, security needs, scalability, SLA expectations and overall infrastructure budget.

Key Points

Provider	Founded	Headquarters	Node Type	Blockchain Coverage	WebSocket	Deployment	Pricing Model	Enterprise Support	Scaling	Key Strength
Zeeve	2021	Singapore	Dedicated, Full, Validator, RPC	Multi-chain, including EVM and other major ecosystems	Yes, where supported	Managed Cloud	Subscription / Custom	Yes	High	Managed dedicated infrastructure
Blockdaemon	2017	New York, USA	Dedicated, Full, Validator, Archive	Broad multi-chain coverage	Yes, where supported	Managed Cloud / Enterprise	Custom / Usage-based	Yes	High	Institutional-grade infrastructure
GetBlock	2019	Global / Remote	Dedicated, Full, Archive, RPC	130+ networks	Yes	Managed / Private	Usage-based / Custom	Yes	High	Dedicated high-load RPC
Tatum	2018	Prague, Czech Republic	Managed Node / API Infrastructure	Multi-chain	Available for supported services	Managed Cloud	Usage / Subscription	Yes	High	Unified blockchain APIs
1RPC	—	—	Privacy-focused RPC	Multi-chain	Network-dependent	Managed RPC	Usage / Service-based	Limited / Custom	Distributed	Privacy-focused RPC access
Gateway.fm	2021	Global / Europe-focused	Full, Validator, RPC, Dedicated	Multi-chain	Yes, where supported	Managed / Cloud	Custom / Enterprise	Yes	High	Managed protocol infrastructure
SubQuery Network	2021	Global	Indexing / RPC / Data Infrastructure	Multi-chain, strong Web3 data focus	Network-dependent	Decentralized / Cloud	Usage / Network-based	Yes	Distributed	Blockchain indexing and data
BlockPI Network	2021	Global	Distributed RPC	Multi-chain	Supported on selected networks	Distributed Network	Usage-based	Custom	High	Distributed low-latency RPC
Uniblock	2022	Global	RPC / API Infrastructure	Multi-chain	Network-dependent	Managed Cloud	Usage-based / Subscription	Custom	High	Simplified multi-chain access
Pocket Network	2017	Decentralized / Global	Decentralized RPC Nodes	Multi-chain	Network-dependent	Decentralized Network	Network-based	Community / Enterprise options	Distributed	Decentralized RPC infrastructure

1. Zeeve

Zeeve is a blockchain infrastructure and node management platform that offers managed RPC, full-node and dedicated-node deployments. Its infrastructure supports major EVM chains and rollups as well as Cosmos SDK and Substrate-based networks like Ethereum, Bitcoin, Polygon, Arbitrum, Avalanche, Binance, Optimism, NEAR and Solana.

Zeeve provides dedicated RPC infrastructure with the ability to customize regions, bandwidth and request limits. For higher tiers, stronger SLA options, high availability setups, priority support, IP whitelisting and custom domains are available.

It has a managed deployment model, making it a good choice for dApps, enterprises and teams that want dedicated infrastructure but don’t want to run nodes themselves.

Best Use Cases of Zeeve,

• Enterprise Blockchain Infrastructure: Perfect for enterprises looking for managed and production ready blockchain node infrastructure.
• Multi-Chain dApps: Useful for apps that want to access multiple blockchain networks via managed infrastructure.
• Dedicated RPC workloads: Great for applications that require dedicated RPC capacity rather than shared endpoints.
  Validator Infrastructure: Ideal for projects requiring expertly managed validator and node deployments.
• Scaling Web3 Infrastructure: Perfect for scaling applications that need scalable node resources and operational support.

Pros	Cons
Managed blockchain node infrastructure	Advanced deployments may require custom plans
Broad blockchain ecosystem support	Pricing can vary by infrastructure configuration
Dedicated RPC and node deployment options	Some features are aimed primarily at professional users
Enterprise-focused infrastructure and support	May be more infrastructure than small projects need
Useful scaling and deployment options	Platform complexity can increase with larger deployments

2. Blockdaemon

Blockdaemon operates a Nodes-as-a-Service platform providing managed dedicated blockchain nodes with infrastructure tailored for applications requiring exclusive node access, predictable connectivity and managed operations.

Users can pick from supported blockchain protocols and configure network, node type and hosting options with its dedicated model. Deployments may span multiple cloud providers and geographic regions.

Blockdaemon supports a wide range of protocols such as Ethereum, Bitcoin, Solana related infrastructure, Arbitrum, Avalanche, Base, BNB Chain, Cardano, Cosmos and others. It supports individual dedicated nodes as well as high availability node clusters and is very relevant to enterprise and production workloads that require scalable infrastructure.

Best Use Cases of Blockdaemon

• Staking Infrastructure: A compelling use case for organizations seeking managed validator and staking infrastructure.
• Institutional Blockchain Infrastructure Perfect for financial institutions and enterprises that need a professional managed blockchain infrastructure.
• High-Availability Applications A good fit for production applications where reliability and infrastructure redundancy are important.
• Multi-Protocol Deployments: Ideal for organizations with infrastructure in different blockchain ecosystems.
• Enterprise Web3 Apps: Good for apps that require infrastructure management, support and scaling.

Pros	Cons
Strong enterprise blockchain infrastructure	Enterprise-oriented features can be costly
Wide protocol coverage	May be more complex for individual developers
Managed node and validator infrastructure	Pricing is not always straightforward
High-availability infrastructure options	Best value is generally for larger workloads
Institutional-grade infrastructure approach	Smaller projects may not need the full platform

3. GetBlock

GetBlock offers private, single-tenant RPC infrastructure for high-load applications and enterprise workloads with dedicated blockchain nodes.

The platform supports 130+ blockchain networks including EVM networks, Solana and Bitcoin and offers full and archive node options. Dedicated infrastructure can include unlimited requests and RPS, custom node configurations, private networking, monitoring, custom alerts and scalable multi-node clusters .

RPC access includes HTTP APIs and WebSockets, and enterprise deployments can use private connections to AWS, GCP or Azure environments. There is not one universal price, but the price depends on the blockchain, network, client, region and the configuration chosen.

Best Use Cases of GetBlock

• High-Traffic dApps: Ideal for apps that generate high amounts of blockchain RPC traffic.
• Dicated RPC Infrastructure: Good for projects who need private or dedicated node access with more resources available.
• Archive Data Workloads: Best for applications that need historical blockchain data and archive-node capabilities.
• Multi-Chain Development: Good for developers who build applications on multiple blockchain chains.
• Enterprise Blockchain Projects: For enterprises that need custom node setups, monitoring, scalability and production infrastructure.

Pros	Cons
Large multi-chain network coverage	Large feature sets can require careful plan selection
Dedicated and private node options	Dedicated infrastructure can cost more than shared RPC
Full and archive node availability	Pricing varies by network and configuration
WebSocket and RPC connectivity	Advanced requirements may need custom arrangements
Suitable for high-volume applications	Smaller projects may find basic plans more appropriate

4. Tatum

Tatum is a multi-chain blockchain development infrastructure platform providing APIs and managed access to blockchains for developers building wallets, payment apps, exchanges, fintech products and Web3 apps.

The infrastructure approach is built around simplifying the connectivity to blockchain through a single development layer, instead of having teams run their own nodes. API access, transaction operations, wallet functionality and developer tooling make up core parts of its platform, while blockchain coverage is across multiple major networks.

The deployment is mainly on Tatum’s infrastructure. The pricing is based on the usage of the platform and plan features. Higher-capacity infrastructure and support options are available for enterprise-focused users running production applications that require reliable blockchain connectivity.

Best Use Cases of Tatum

• Blockchain Application Development: Useful for developers who are building applications that require simplified access to blockchain functionality.
• Crypto Wallets: For wallet apps needing multi-chain blockchain access and transactions.
  Crypto Payments: A good use case for payment apps which can connect to multiple blockchain networks.
  Exchange Development: For projects that are building exchange infrastructure with needs for blockchain transactions and asset management.
• Financial Technology Applications: Ideal for companies that are integrating blockchain elements into their financial and digital-asset services.

Pros	Cons
Unified blockchain development infrastructure	Not primarily positioned as a traditional dedicated-node vendor
Multi-chain development capabilities	Advanced usage can increase overall costs
Useful APIs for blockchain applications	Developers may rely heavily on Tatum’s abstraction layer
Strong wallet and payment use cases	Less infrastructure control than self-managed nodes
Suitable for fintech and Web3 applications	Exact capabilities vary across supported networks

5. 1RPC

Rather than charting the route of typical dedicated-node vendors, 1RPC pursues a different approach, emphasizing privacy-preserving RPC access and transaction security. Its infrastructure is built to offer blockchain RPC connectivity, while reducing exposure of user activity to the minimum and allowing secure interaction with decentralized applications.

The service spans several blockchain networks and is especially relevant for users who prioritize RPC privacy, transaction metadata, and secure Web3 access.

It’s an RPC-based model of deployment (not the traditional customer-managed dedicated-server model). Users considering 1RPC should understand the difference between privacy-oriented RPC access and a fully dedicated node. Pricing and enterprise arrangements may vary depending on required infrastructure and level of use.

Best Use Cases of 1RPC

• Privacy-First dApps: Suitable for users and applications that need extra privacy while connecting to blockchain RPC infrastructure.
• Protected Web3 Access: Useful for applications that are looking for RPC connectivity, with greater emphasis on protecting request related information.
  DeFi Users: Potentially relevant for decentralized finance users worried about their blockchain activity being leaked through traditional RPC endpoints.
• Web3 Wallet Connectivity: Useful where privacy-centric RPC access is foundational to wallet infrastructure.
• Decentralized Application Access: Ideal for projects looking to move away from traditional centralized rpc access models.

Pros	Cons
Privacy-focused RPC infrastructure	Not a conventional dedicated-node provider
Designed to reduce unnecessary RPC exposure	Dedicated infrastructure options are more limited
Useful for privacy-conscious Web3 users	Less suitable for organizations seeking full node ownership
Alternative to conventional centralized RPC access	Enterprise infrastructure capabilities are narrower
Simple approach to privacy-oriented RPC access	Blockchain and feature coverage can vary

6. Gateway.fm

Gateway.fm is a blockchain infrastructure provider specializing in managed node deployments, RPC services and infrastructure for protocols, institutions and Web3 applications.

The platform supports multiple blockchain ecosystems and is built on professionally operated infrastructure, rather than requiring customers to manage node software, updates and infrastructure operations themselves.

Deployment is customizable to blockchain, network and infrastructure needs, making it relevant for teams needing dedicated or customized node environments.

Production-focused support, infrastructure management and scalable deployments are benefits for enterprise customers. Gateway.fm is worth considering particularly if a project needs more control and operational support than a basic shared RPC endpoint.

Best Use Cases of Gateway. fm

• Managed Blockchain Nodes: For teams that want professionally managed node infrastructure, but don’t want to manage the full infrastructure stack themselves.
  Enterprise Web3 Infrastructure For organizations that require production-grade blockchain infrastructure and operational support.
• Protocol Infrastructure: Great for blockchain protocols requiring managed infrastructure for their networks.
• Dedicated RPC Requirements: Good for applications that need dedicated or custom blockchain access.
• Web3 applications that scale: For projects that require infrastructure to scale with application demand.

Pros	Cons
Managed blockchain infrastructure	Enterprise deployments may require custom pricing
Suitable for protocol infrastructure	Less focused on consumer-level use cases
Professional node management	Advanced infrastructure can require technical knowledge
Production-oriented deployment options	Public pricing may not cover every configuration
Useful for growing Web3 projects	Smaller applications may not need its broader infrastructure

7. SubQuery Network

SubQuery Network is not a provider that just provides standard RPC endpoints. SubQuery is a combination of blockchain infrastructure and indexing and data-access capabilities.

The ecosystem is designed to provide developers access to blockchain data via decentralized infrastructure and indexing services and is highly relevant for applications that require structured blockchain information, not just simple transaction submission. Its technology has historically powered ecosystems such as Polkadot, Substrate, Cosmos and other blockchain networks.

Deployment can involve decentralized infrastructure and indexing services, and scaling is related to network demand and data workloads. # Pricing depends on the particular SubQuery services and infrastructure needs, making it especially interesting for data-intensive Web3 applications.

Best Use Cases of SubQuery Network

• Indexing Blockchain Data: Especially helpful for apps that require data organized for querying on the blockchain.
  Data-Intensive dApps: For applications that need more than basic RPC access to get blockchain information.
• Web3 Analytics: Useful for analytics platforms that require indexed blockchain information for applications and dashboards.
• Multi-Chain Data Apps: For developers working across multiple blockchain ecosystems.
  Decentralized data infrastructure: Great for projects interested in decentralized approaches to blockchain indexing and data access.

Pros	Cons
Strong blockchain indexing capabilities	More specialized than a basic RPC provider
Useful for structured blockchain data	Indexing can require additional configuration
Supports data-intensive Web3 applications	Not primarily designed around dedicated physical nodes
Relevant for blockchain analytics	Best suited to data-focused workloads
Decentralized infrastructure approach	Users seeking simple RPC access may prefer another provider

8. BlockPI Network

BlockPI Network is a provider of blockchain infrastructure specializing in high performance RPC connectivity and distributed blockchain access. Its infrastructure is built to improve RPC performance by distributing requests over geographically distributed infrastructure and suitable for applications where latency and reliability matter.

BlockPI supports multiple blockchain networks and offers RPC access in a developer-friendly way. Its distributed architecture can help applications to cope with increasing request volumes.

Its deployment model is not similar to traditional single-server dedicated node as the focus is on distributed RPC infrastructure and network-level performance. Pricing will generally depend on the selected service and usage, and larger applications may opt for custom infrastructure to match traffic demands.

Best Use Cases of BlockPI Network

• Low-Latency dApps: Good for applications where fast, reliable RPC connectivity matters.
• High Volume RPC Traffic: Useful for applications that serve large numbers of blockchain requests.
• Multi-Chain Applications: For developers who need to interact with multiple blockchain networks.
  DeFi Infrastructure: Great for trading and DeFi apps that need quick access to blockchain data.
  Globally Distributed Applications: Suitable for applications which can take advantage of distributed RPC infrastructure and geographically distributed access.

Pros	Cons
Focus on distributed RPC infrastructure	Not equivalent to a traditional single dedicated node
Designed for high-performance RPC access	Infrastructure model can be harder to compare directly
Multi-chain support	Feature availability varies by network
Useful for high-volume applications	Pricing depends on usage and service requirements
Distributed architecture can improve resilience	Less direct infrastructure control than self-hosting

9. Uniblock

Uniblock is a multi-chain Web3 infrastructure platform to unlock easier access to blockchain RPCs, APIs and development services across different networks.

It provides developers with the infrastructure to connect applications to blockchain data and transactions without deploying and maintaining every underlying node themselves. Its multi-chain approach is useful for teams building applications that interact with several blockchain ecosystems. Availability of WebSocket and RPC depends on supported network and chosen service.

Deployment is mainly done through platform. Pricing is generally influenced by usage and infrastructure needs, with higher-volume projects able to look into larger capacity or bespoke setups for production workloads.

Best Use Cases of Uniblock

• Multi-Chain dApps: For developers who need to connect to multiple blockchains using a single infrastructure layer.
• Web3 Development: Ideal for teams looking to streamline their blockchain integration and infrastructure management.
• Wallet apps: Useful for apps that need access to blockchain data and the ability to make transactions.
  DeFi Applications: Useful for decentralized applications that communicate with multiple blockchain networks.
  Rapid Prototyping: Great for development teams that want to add blockchain functionality without having to run infrastructure for each supported network.

Pros	Cons
Simplifies multi-chain blockchain access	Less focused on dedicated physical infrastructure
Developer-friendly Web3 infrastructure	Advanced requirements may need higher-tier arrangements
Useful for multi-chain applications	Infrastructure control is lower than self-hosting
Helps reduce node-management overhead	Exact capabilities vary between networks
Suitable for wallets and dApps	Less specialized for large enterprise node operations

10. Pocket Network

Pocket Network is a decentralized blockchain infrastructure network that offers RPC access through a distributed network of node operators, instead of relying on a single centralized infrastructure provider.

It’s designed to distribute blockchain requests across independent node operators and give applications access to a variety of supported networks in the Pocket ecosystem. This fundamentally changes its model from that of a traditional dedicated server provider, as infrastructure resources are delivered through a decentralized network.

The scaling is made possible by the distributed nature of the underlying node network and the pricing reflects the decentralized infrastructure model of the network. This makes Pocket Network particularly relevant for projects that value decentralized RPC infrastructure, resilience and less reliance on a single infrastructure operator.

Best Use Cases of Pocket Network (POKT)

• Decentralized RPC Infrastructure: For projects that want to access blockchain via a decentralized network of node operators.
• Multi-Chain dApps: Useful for applications that need to access supported blockchain networks through decentralized RPC infrastructure.
  RPC Resilience: Good for projects that want to reduce the dependence on one central infrastructure operator.
• Web3 Infrastructure Decentralization: Ideal for apps that view decentralized infrastructure as an integral part of their tech stack.
• Scalable Blockchain Access: Perfect for apps that require RPC capacity from a distributed network of infrastructure providers.

Pros	Cons
Decentralized RPC infrastructure model	Different from conventional dedicated-node hosting
Reduces dependence on one infrastructure operator	Users have less direct control over individual nodes
Distributed node-operator ecosystem	Performance can vary across network conditions
Strong fit for decentralized Web3 infrastructure	Not ideal when exclusive server resources are required
Supports multi-chain blockchain access	Provider comparison is less direct because of its decentralized model

Conclusion

There is more to choosing the right dedicated crypto node provider than just blockchain coverage or pricing. Zeeve and Blockdaemon are particularly notable for managed enterprise infrastructure, and GetBlock is more dedicated to dedicated nodes and high-load RPC requirements.

Tatum is good for multi-chain development. Gateway.fm and SubQuery Network provide more infrastructure and data capabilities. BlockPI, 1RPC, Uniblock and Pocket Network offer different solutions for scalable and distributed blockchain access. Compare node types,

WebSocket support, deployment options, pricing, scalability, security, uptime, and enterprise support before choosing a provider to find infrastructure that fits your application’s workload and long-term Web3 needs.

FAQ