10 Best Wallets for DAO Fund Control in 2026

I’ll go over the top wallet for DAO fund management in this post. Managing a DAO treasury involves security, transparency, and seamless governance integration.

Selecting a wallet that guarantees multi-signature approvals, appropriate role-based permissions, and DeFi protocol compatibility is essential given the variety of wallets available. We will review the main solutions and emphasize why Gnosis Safe stands out for DAO fund management.

How To Choose wallet for DAO fund control

Multi-Signature Protection: A Wallet is approved by a several members of a DAO. Make sure the wallet permits multi-signature (multi-sig) transactions, meaning that multiple members need to sign off on a transaction. This eliminates the potential for a single person to make an unauthorized transaction and spend DAO resources.

Integration with DAO governance: During your search, find a wallet that connects to the on-chain governance tools so that proposals, votes, and approvals are embedded and executed from the wallet.

Role-Based Access Control: Opt for wallets that provide adjustable roles and varying tiers of permissions so that members can be restricted to an appropriate level of access to the funds or influence to make decisions.

Connectivity with DeFi and Protocols: A DAO wallet should be able to pair with the most important DeFi services, staking platforms, and liquidity products so that the treasury is able to grow.

Auditability and Transparency: The DAO should be able to see the transaction flow, so select a wallet with on-chain visibility, transaction flow, and auditing tools so members of the DAO can justify the actions with accountability.

Walet and Key Security: DAO wallets that use reliable key management techniques like the use of a hardware wallet or MPC (multi-party computation) are less likely to be hacked. Select wallets that use good key management practices.

User Interface and Integration Assortment: Some wallets come with a better user experience and more integrations and plugins that facilitate treasury management.

Key Point & Best wallet for DAO fund control List

Wallet / Custody Solution	Key Point / Feature
Gnosis Safe (Safe Global)	Multi-sig wallet popular for DAOs; high security and flexible transaction approvals.
Fireblocks DAO Custody	Institutional-grade custody with MPC & insurance; supports DAO treasury management.
BitGo Multi-Sig Wallet	Enterprise-grade multi-signature wallet with compliance and insurance features.
Qredo Wallet	Decentralized custody platform with MPC and instant settlement for institutions.
Cobo Custody	Secure custody solution with multi-chain support and insurance coverage.
MetaMask Institutional (MMI)	Institutional version of MetaMask; integrates compliance, secure key management.
Aragon DAO Wallet	DAO-native wallet; built for decentralized governance and treasury management.
Tally Wallet	Designed for DAOs; enables multi-sig and governance operations directly on-chain.
Zengo Business Wallet	Keyless crypto wallet with MPC security; aimed at businesses and institutional use.
Anchor DAO Wallet	DAO-focused wallet with governance and treasury management tools.

1. Gnosis Safe (Safe Global)

Gnosis Safe (now Safe Global) is one of the most prominent players in the multi-signature wallet space. As a top tier multi-signature wallet and a leader in the market, Gnosis Safe facilitates the secure and decentralized management of digital assets across multiple signatures and reduces risks by preventing an execution from a single point of failure.

Gnosis is a prominent solution for teams and DAOs because of the extensive support for ERC-20 tokens and Smart contracts. Regarding DAO fund control, Gnosis Safe is arguably the most compelling due to seamless governance integrations, adaptive control layers,

extensibility, on-chain voting, automated treasury workflows, and fund cycle management. Gnosis Safe has a myriad of solutions including dashboards, treasury management integrations with DeFi solutions, and hardware wallet management.

Gnosis Safe (Safe Global) Features, Pros & Cons

Features

• Cross‑chain compatibility (EVM)
• Hardware wallet integration
• Plugins & extensions
• DAO governance integrations
• Multi‑sig wallets

Pros

• Best DAO fund control
• Flexible approval layers
• Extremely secure with multi-sig flows
• Governance & DeFi infrastructure
• On-chain history
• Self-serve protocols

Cons

• Complex governance & setup
• New users may find UX challenging
• Few options for non-EVM chains
• High gas fees (Ethereum)
• No direct fiat on-ramp

2. Fireblocks DAO Custody

Fireblocks DAO Custody is the most secure and operationally scalable digital asset custody service. It offers institutional-grade custody of digital assets built around a highly secure and operationally scalable model.

Fireblocks employs multi-party computation (MPC) to eliminate private key exposure, so assets are secure in transit and at rest. Because of its automated governance workflows, rule enforcement, and audit trails, this service is best suited for organizations and DAOs with large treasury holdings.

When setting up the fund control for a DAO, Fireblocks provides programmable rules and role-based permissions for the proper authorization of spend requests.

Given the insurance coverage and compliance tooling, Fireblocks is attractive to professional treasurers who need to mitigate risks. Fireblocks also integrates seamlessly with exchanges, DeFi protocols, and custodial partners.

Fireblocks DAO Custody Features, Pros & Cons

Features

• Automated Policy
• Custody for Institutions
• Audit Trail
• Compliance Features
• MPC based Key Management

Pros

• Enterprise Level Security
• Policy Control for Spending Limits
• Built in Insurance
• DeFi & Exchange Straight Through
• Solid Compliance & Reporting
• Spend Limit Policy Control

Cons

• DAO’s with limited budgets may find it expensive
• Custodial approach compared to DAO Wallets
• Onboarding is Delicate
• Additional Customization is Tokenized
• Not Open Source

3. BitGo Multi-Sig Wallet

BitGo Multi-Sig Wallet is one of the first enterprise wallet solutions, focusing on high security and compliance. For a more compliant DAO, BitGo can distribute signer authority so that treasury functions of the DAO are performed only after certain rules are configured and approval is received from a specific number of designated signers.

This is done using a multi-sig structure that requires multiple keys, including one from BitGo and one from the client, to sign a transaction, thus eliminating the risks of single key wallets. For DAOs that require a balance between decentralized control and regulated custodial services, BitGo also provides institutional grade services, audited infrastructure, and custody that is insured.

BitGo Multi‑Sig Wallet Features, Pros & Cons

Features

• Insurance options
• Compliance Tools
• Institutional Custody Services
• Multi signature Security
• API integrations

Pros

• Proven Enterprise Security & Compliance
• Regulation Compliance for Organizations
• Strong Insurance & Security
• API for Automation
• Supports multiple tokens

Cons

• Is not specifically DAO‑native
• Centralized key sharing
• You may incur high fees
• Opens less governance tooling
• UI is less like community workflows

4. Qredo Wallet

Qredo Wallet is a decentralized custody and settlement network that uses multi-party computation (MPC) and offers seamless settlement with the added capability of instant and cross-chain settlement, which is great for more advanced treasury processes.

With DAO treasury management, Qredo enables DAOs to establish governance frameworks and set approval thresholds, ensuring treasury movements are aligned with member Agreement. Qredo’s proprietary network further enables liquidity management, DeFi activity, and institutional access.

The emphasis on interoperability and safe low-cost decentralized custody attracts DAOs that need scalable and adaptable treasury management to support fully autonomous operations across multiple chains and various asset classes.

Qredo Wallet Features, Pros & Cons

Features

• Custody is MPC‑based
• Supports multiple chains
• Instant settlements
• Validator network
• Focused on institutions

Pros

• True MPC removes single‑key threats
• Great at cross‑chain transactions
• Quick settlements
• Great for institutions
• Provides access to DeFi

Cons

• Focus on governance of DAOs is lacking
• Steeper learning curve
• Less tooling compared to Safe ecosystem
• UI may be lacking polish for beginners
• Centralization of custody may be seen as more risky

5. Cobo Custody

Cobo Custody provides DAO participants with a unified custodian experience for digital assets that spans multiple chains. It utilizes a combination of hardware security modules (HSMs) and multi-party computation (MPC) to establish a distributed key management system that avoids single-point failures.

This solution includes on-chain and off-chain control, institutional-level compliance, and optional insurance. Regarding DAO fund control, Cobo offers adjustable governance frameworks and multi-party consents with a DAO’s internal logic.

Spend control and access rights categorization are adjustable to the organizational structure of a DAO. Cobo provides additional tools, including analytics, reporting, and auditing, making them a suitable partner for professional treasury services.

Cobo Custody Features, Pros & Cons

Features

• Security is Hybrid HSM/MPC
• Supports multiple chains
• Compliance & Audits
• Access control by role provided
• Insurance is available

Pros

• The hybrid HSM/MPC
• The strong compliance feature set
• Support for multiple chains
• Auditing & Reporting
• Team policy controls

Cons

• Features are not natively DAO focused
• More centralized systems have administrative structures
• They are expensive for small scale projects
• The User Experience is enterprise focused
• The integration of governance is less provided

6. MetaMask Institutional (MMI)

MetaMask Institutional builds on the MetaMask wallet with additional functionality aimed at teams, funds, and DAOs, focusing on secure and compliant management of assets.

MMI uses state-of-the-art key management, policy controls, and compliance and analytics partner integrations, connecting DeFi access with institutional expectations. With MMI, an organizations’ DAO fund control allows them to set spend approvals, address whitelists, and internal policy enforcement, which assures that treasury actions are subject to review before being executed.

MMI facilitates integrated decision-making and spans the DeFi sector by combining the widely used MetaMask with adjustable governance. It brings asset protection with operational control and allows DAO treasuries to engage with various DeFi protocols and governance contracts.

MetaMask Institutional (MMI) Features, Pros & Cons

Features

• Institutional MetaMask
• Policy controls & whitelists
• Compliance integrations
• Access to DeFi
• Management of keys by teams

Pros

• UI is like MetaMask
• Integrates with almost all DeFi/DEXs
• Risk & compliance
• Spend controls & whitelisting
• Onboarding is easy

Cons

• Governance wallet is lacking full DAO
• – Security is MetaMask model tethered
• – Out of the box, multi-sig is limited
• – Not suited for large treasuries by themselves
• – Utilizes external governance tools

7. Aragon DAO Wallet

Aragon DAO Wallet is purpose‑built for decentralized autonomous organizations functioning within the Aragon governance ecosystem. It seamlessly executes member-approved proposals thanks to its close integration with Aragon’s on-chain voting procedures.

Decentralized control is made possible by the wallet’s permissioning architecture, which guarantees that financial transactions represent group decisions. Aragon strengthens democratic asset stewardship by offering transparent proposal workflows and adaptable access tiers for DAO fund governance.

Without the need for middlemen, members are able to examine treasury balances, take part in governance, and approve spend decisions. Aragon’s infrastructure simplifies decentralized legal frameworks and treasury management, making it an appealing solution for DAOs seeking tight integration between governance and treasury operations on supported chains.

Aragon DAO Wallet Features, Pros & Cons

Features

• Wallet is DAO-native
• Governance on chain
• Integrated systems for proposals
• Tiers of permission
• Tools for transparency

Pros

• From the very first concept for DAOs, Aragon is built
• Links governance & treasury directly
• Results of votes are transparent
• Permissions based on role
• Analytics in abundance

Cons

• Ecosystem is smaller compared to Gnosis Safe
• – Connections outside of Aragon are lacking
• – Governance comes with it a learning curve
• – Not widely adopted in the industry
• – Security layers are basic at best

8. Tally Wallet

Tally Wallet is a governance-focused wallet made specifically for community-led protocols and DAOs. It prioritizes connection with on‑chain voting and proposal systems, expediting treasury interactions based on member consensus.

Tally’s interface increases openness regarding DAO decision-making by highlighting governance indicators, proposal histories, and token holder participation. In order to avoid unauthorized asset movement, Tally makes sure that spending actions are in line with approved proposals and set levels for DAO fund control.

Communities are empowered to make wise decisions by its emphasis on governance data and analytics. Tally helps DAOs that strive for secure treasury administration and inclusive participation by fusing multi-sig controls with an easy-to-use governance experience.

Tally Wallet Features, Pros & Cons

Features

• Wallet is governance oriented
• Tracking of proposals
• Tools for voting
• Interactions on-chain
• Dashboards for transparency

Pros

• Great experience in governance
• Good visibility for proposal & votes
• Excellent for engaging the community
• DAO stacks integration

Cons

• Less multi-sig security options
• – Not a custody solution on its own
• – Depends heavily on governance platforms
• – Limited DeFi integration
• – Not suited for treasuries alone

9. Zengo Business Wallet

Zengo Business Wallet provides a keyless custody solution using multi-party computation (MPC) and eliminates the risk of loss or theft of a private key. Zengo Business offers team and enterprise solutions with role-based control, permissioning, and auditing functionality designed for professional treasury management.

For DAO fund management, the wallet’s MPC model allows unique distributed control with select managers so treasury movement is made by a decision.

The combination of sophisticated security and a simple interface offers optimal protection to enterprises and ease of use to DAOs. Other treasury management features include integrations with cryptocurrency exchanges, decentralized finance, and analytics.

Zengo Business Wallet Features, Pros & Cons

Features

• MPC keyless security
• Business governance
• Role permissions
• Audit logs
• Exchange & DeFi access

Pros

• Keyless MPC reduces single point risk
• Intuitive for teams
• Good permissions and audit tools
• Mobile and desktop
• Integrates with DeFi

Cons

• Not DAO native governance
• Smaller ecosystem
• Less multi sig tradition
• Limited advanced treasury tools
• Business focus not pure DAO

10. Anchor DAO Wallet

The goal of Anchor DAO Wallet is to provide safe, governance-aligned treasury management to decentralized autonomous organizations. It ensures that financial actions reflect the collective decisions of DAO members by supporting multi-signature and permissioned access control.

Proposals and approvals can be translated straight into wallet activities without the need for human interaction thanks to Anchor’s integration with governance procedures. For DAO fund control, its variable approval thresholds and role‑based permissions help enforce internal rules, prohibiting unilateral operations.

Members have a comprehensive understanding of treasury operations thanks to the wallet’s auditability and transparency. By combining governance automation with solid custody mechanisms, Anchor DAO Wallet is optimized for DAOs valuing decentralized oversight and accountable fund management.

Anchor DAO Wallet Features, Pros & Cons

Features

• Multi sig controls
• Governance integrations
• Role based access
• DAO treasury focus
• Audit and tracking

Pros

• Built for DAO fund oversight
• Clear approval workflows
• Good treasury transparency
• Configurable signatures
• Integrates governance actions

Cons

• New and smaller ecosystem
• Limited non EVM support
• Less tooling than safe
• UI still evolving
• Lower adoption

Conclusion

Gnosis Safe (Safe Global) is unquestionably the greatest choice for DAO fund governance after examining the leading DAO and institutional wallets. Its multi-signature architecture ensures that all transactions require authorization from specified individuals, lowering risks of illegitimate expenditure.

Beyond security, Gnosis Safe works easily with on-chain governance tools, dashboards, and DeFi protocols, allowing DAOs to administer treasuries transparently and quickly. It is incredibly flexible for both small and large DAOs thanks to its expandable ecosystem, modular plugins, and hardware wallet compatibility.

For enterprises demanding decentralized control, transparency, and robust treasury management, Gnosis Safe remains the industry standard.

FAQ